GAO says USDA needs to tighten up policies at certain labs
GAO says USDA needs to tighten up policies at certain labs
2018-02-07 From:Food Safety News A federal review of laboratories handling many of the most dangerous pathogens on the planet, including some that can be foodborne such as Brucella and bacterium that cause botulism poisoning, shows room for improvement. The “high-containment laboratories” are overseen by the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services via the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Agriculture through its Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).
The effectiveness of safety controls at labs handling select agents has been in the spotlight in the past three years. “For example, in November 2016, the Department of Homeland Security discovered that a private laboratory had inadvertently sent a toxic form of ricin — a potentially lethal poison — to one of its training centers multiple times since 2011, potentially putting training participants at risk,” according to the GAO report. “In May 2015, the Department of Defense (DOD) discovered that a DOD laboratory had inadvertently shipped live anthrax bacteria to nearly 200 other laboratories worldwide over the course of 12 years. And in July 2014, the National Institutes of Health discovered decades-old vials of smallpox in a storage room of a Food and Drug Administration laboratory on its campus.” The accountability office found the agencies involved with the Select Agent Program have made improvements, such as hiring additional staff and sharing more information with the public and registered laboratories. Nevertheless, according to the GAO report, the program does not fully meet all key elements of effective oversight. “For example, the program is not independent in that it is not structurally distinct and separate from all of the laboratories it oversees. Both CDC and APHIS have individually made structural changes and put mechanisms in place to reduce conflicts of interest, but the APHIS component of the program has not documented the reporting process it developed to reduce conflicts of interest,” according to the GAO report. “Until APHIS formally documents the reporting structure for its component of the program from the APHIS director of the program to the administrator of APHIS, it will continue to appear to have conflicts of interest in its oversight of APHIS-owned laboratories.” Also, on at least three occasions, APHIS inspected its own or other USDA laboratories, which is not in keeping with the memorandum of understanding it signed with the CDC. Moreover, the program is not fully transparent because it shares only limited information about lessons learned and other matters with registered laboratories, and there is no consensus about what additional information should be shared. (To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)
Claims:
The copyrights of articles in the website belong to authors. Please inform us if there is any violation of intellectual property and we will delete the articles immediately.
Relevent Information
more »
» Vietnam attends Asia-Pacific Food Expo in Singapore
» Codex makes £2m investment » Nestlé’s Gerber and TerraCycle partner for recycling programme » Arla Foods develops climate database to reduce emissions » Recyclable packaging solution for latest Nestlé snack bar » Cargill opens Culinary Experience Hub at R&D facility in Belgium » M&S offers reusable containers for fresh food to go » Dean Foods opts for standalone plan following strategic review » M&S joins forces with Infarm to bring urban farming to its stores » Fonterra to reduce water use at six New Zealand facilities by 30% |
Hot Topic
|
Chinese Food Industry Magazine
TEL:886-2-28941823 FAX:886-2-28941837 E-mail:viya@foodsourcings.com
Copyright Notice © 2010 Foodsourcings All rights reserved.
Powered by Foodsourcings & Chinese Food Industry Magazine